当前位置: 主页 > 成功案例 >

私家侦探

联系我们

联系人:

手机:

固话:

地址:

服务项目

湘潭夫妻"闪婚""闪离"后复婚又想离 法官没

作者:admin  日期:2019-03-07 10:28  人气:
在生活节奏越来越快的今天,“闪婚”似乎成了司空见惯的现象,但如果婚姻没有深厚基础,很大程度上伴随着“闪离”的危险。前不久,湘潭县人民法院就受理了这样一起“闪婚”又“闪离”的案件。
 
In today's fast-paced life, "flash marriage" seems to be a common phenomenon, but if there is no deep foundation for marriage, to a large extent accompanied by the risk of "flash away". Not long ago, Xiangtan County People's Court accepted such a case of "flash marriage" and "flash divorce".
 
 
 
2013年初,龙翔与侯琳经人介绍相识,很快,他们就在2013年4月登记结婚。当时,龙翔年过四十,侯琳比他小11岁,年龄上的差异,让两人的婚姻从一开始就不为外人看好。
 
At the beginning of 2013, Longxiang and Hou Lin were introduced, and soon they registered for marriage in April 2013. At that time, Longxiang was over 40 years old, and Hou Lin was 11 years younger than him. The difference in age made their marriage unpleasant from the beginning.
 
 
 
因婚前相处时间短,两人缺乏了解,感情基础淡薄,结婚以后朝夕相对,经常为一些小事发生争吵。结婚两个月后,两人匆匆离婚。
 
Because of the short time before marriage, lack of understanding and weak emotional foundation, they often quarrel over minor matters. Two months after their marriage, they divorced in a hurry.
 
 
 
既然不合适,离开也不失为一种解脱。然而离婚后没多久,龙翔就找到侯琳,希望与她复婚。
 
Since it is inappropriate, leaving is also a relief. However, not long after the divorce, Longxiang found Hou Lin, hoping to remarry her.
 
 
 
是龙翔对侯琳旧情复燃?非也,他是冲着土地征收来的。当时,侯琳家正面临征收,龙翔想从中“分一杯羹”。
 
Is it Longxiang's rekindling of Hou Lin's old love? No, he was expropriated for land. At that time, Hou Lin's family was facing expropriation, from which Longxiang wanted to "share a piece of soup".
 
 
 
龙翔本以为侯琳不会同意,没想到她居然答应了。2013年10月,双方办理了复婚登记。之后,两人又生活在了一起。
 
Longxiang thought Hou Lin would not agree, but she actually agreed. In October 2013, the two parties registered for remarriage. After that, they lived together again.
 
 
 
然而好景不长,2014年12月,侯琳又以婚后没有建立夫妻感情为由,向法院起诉离婚。而这时,距离两人复婚才不到一年。
 
However, the good times are not long. In December 2014, Hou Lin sued the court for divorce on the grounds that she did not establish the relationship between husband and wife after marriage. It was less than a year before they remarried.
 
 
 
不久前,湘潭县法院对这起离婚案做出一审判决,结果让人大跌眼镜。法院认为侯琳起诉离婚的证据不足,不准予两人离婚。
 
Not long ago, the Xiangtan County Court made a first-instance judgment on the divorce case, and the result was shocking. The court held that there was insufficient evidence for Hou Lin to sue for divorce and refused to allow them to divorce.

下一篇:再婚夫妻的婚前财产怎么界定

上一篇:婚外情诉讼离婚取证要注意什么问题

信用资质